supernaturalapocalypse:

rabbithugs:

i love how vague this is because it implies that what the pigeons do is too scary to write down
"we cannot bear to tell you what horrors the pigeons have wrought"

supernaturalapocalypse:

rabbithugs:

i love how vague this is because it implies that what the pigeons do is too scary to write down

"we cannot bear to tell you what horrors the pigeons have wrought"

(Source: essaymarking, via the-fangirl-curse)

suns-of-gallifrey:

rainbowheartdesertstars:

lumos5001:

fandom-universe:

HOW DID WE MISS THIS

all bow down to RTD for the most subtle plot twist ever

donna = my favorite.

Awwww… my Donna. It’s accurate, though. That is the translation of her name.

(Source: youtube.com, via shebelongsinthetardis)

(Source: adirred, via l00nyluna)

jimmoriartyistheboss:

cartooon-heart:

ocparty-cas:

when you sneeze unexpectedly 

image

ITS NOT EVEN A FUCKING SLOW REGENERATION HE LITERALY JUST SNEEZED INTO 12

(via l00nyluna)

theplaceforus:

pyksii:

saddeer:

I have this weird theory that some people are drawn to each other because their atoms were near each other when the universe was created and over time the same atoms keep coming back together

DID YOU JUST SCIENTIFICALLY EXPLAIN SOUL MATES?!

thank you science side

(via alaskansnowangel)

milafawnkawaiielfgoddessangelic:

truthtellingtime:

Just so everybody knows, the mirror is actually more reliable than the camera. Even though people say “the camera never lies”, it distorts your photographs a little bit. It has to turn a 3d image (you in real life) to a 2d image (a photograph) and consequently skews the proportions a little bit.
Also, “photogenic” is a real thing. Certain faces photograph well and others don’t. It’s all down the angles, proportions and size of your features.
Have you ever seen someone stunning who looks great in professional photographs and not in candids? Yeah, that’s because there’s a huge difference between a professional and an amateur. Professionals know how to minimise the issues cameras have. Lighting, angles and even the distance you are away from the camera plays a part (the amount of distortion varies depending on how close you are).
TL;DR if you think you look great in the mirror but not in the photo, trust the mirror. You look great!

NOT ONLY THAT, but when you look in a mirror, you’re seeing your face in motion, how others would see it. In a photograph, you’re still, and it can make small flaws and the like seem a lot more prominent, despite them being quite minuscule in person.

Also, your brain is trained to recognize your reflection, in which your right becomes your left. Your brain is also trained to put more emphasis on the left (if I’m remembering correctly, I cant find the article again) side of faces than the right side of faces when determining beauty. Since your reflection has your left as your right, and pictures have your left as your left, you will always find your photographs to be uglier than your reflection.

milafawnkawaiielfgoddessangelic:

truthtellingtime:

Just so everybody knows, the mirror is actually more reliable than the camera. Even though people say “the camera never lies”, it distorts your photographs a little bit. It has to turn a 3d image (you in real life) to a 2d image (a photograph) and consequently skews the proportions a little bit.

Also, “photogenic” is a real thing. Certain faces photograph well and others don’t. It’s all down the angles, proportions and size of your features.

Have you ever seen someone stunning who looks great in professional photographs and not in candids? Yeah, that’s because there’s a huge difference between a professional and an amateur. Professionals know how to minimise the issues cameras have. Lighting, angles and even the distance you are away from the camera plays a part (the amount of distortion varies depending on how close you are).

TL;DR if you think you look great in the mirror but not in the photo, trust the mirror. You look great!

NOT ONLY THAT, but when you look in a mirror, you’re seeing your face in motion, how others would see it. In a photograph, you’re still, and it can make small flaws and the like seem a lot more prominent, despite them being quite minuscule in person.

Also, your brain is trained to recognize your reflection, in which your right becomes your left. Your brain is also trained to put more emphasis on the left (if I’m remembering correctly, I cant find the article again) side of faces than the right side of faces when determining beauty. Since your reflection has your left as your right, and pictures have your left as your left, you will always find your photographs to be uglier than your reflection.

(Source: owlygem, via i-am-in-way-too-many-fandoms)

This part, right here, was the only part of the show last night that I had any emotion for. It was such a beautiful scene.

(Source: timelordgifs, via timelordgifs)

sharkchunks:

iandsharman:

notahoe:

my type of public transportation 

“Why were you late in today?”
“Oh, I got tied up on the subway…”

I was always 50/50 on whether to reblog this but the last comment pushed it to like 95/5 in favor.

sharkchunks:

iandsharman:

notahoe:

my type of public transportation 

“Why were you late in today?”

“Oh, I got tied up on the subway…”

I was always 50/50 on whether to reblog this but the last comment pushed it to like 95/5 in favor.

(via ticking-clocks-live)


Do you guys remember That’s So Raven? That’s So Raven, one of the few shows Disney channel did right. That’s So Raven, if you don’t remember starred Raven Symone as Raven Baxter. Let me tell you somethings about Raven Baxter; Raven Baxter wasn’t a thin girl nor did she want to be famous singer like EVERY OTHER CHARACTER ON TELEVISION TODAY. No, Raven was a girl with some extra meat on her bones that wanted to be a fashion designer and model her own work. Remember the episode where a magazine put her head on another model’s body because she didn’t have ‘the look’ and how Raven fought to change it? What happened to episodes like that, Disney Channel? Yes, That’s So Raven, despite being a show about a psychic, was the most real kids show on television. What about the episode dealing with racism when the store manager refused to hire Raven because she’s black? Or the episode dealing with drugs when Raven thought her brother, Cory, was smoking? This was a show that was popular and relatable. It didn’t feature a new song every week, it didn’t need to! The hilarious antics of the costume wearing Raven Baxter, mixed with life lessons we can actually read, made this show the best show Disney Channel came up with ever.

I wouldn’t say it was the best (BMW was an original Disney show), but it was among the last of the good shows. The problem with Nick and Disney is that the audience changed. Kid’s from the 90s-early 2000s were raised by parents who wanted their children to be well rounded, to have a sense of self that wasnt defined by society, to achieve greatness through hard work, to stand up for themselves, etc. From about 2003 on, the demographics changed. Parents were insisting that children be perfect, even if that meant that children weren’t to do their own work. Children were to be defined by society (smart, fit, a shining example of what it means to be a human, etc), which means that parents force their children to perform tasks they otherwise have no interest in and/or become famous in whatever talents the parents think they have. Children are taught to let others stand up for them and to prey on those who are weaker/different than they are. And, television changed to appeal to these children and parents.

Do you guys remember That’s So Raven? That’s So Raven, one of the few shows Disney channel did right. That’s So Raven, if you don’t remember starred Raven Symone as Raven Baxter. Let me tell you somethings about Raven Baxter; Raven Baxter wasn’t a thin girl nor did she want to be famous singer like EVERY OTHER CHARACTER ON TELEVISION TODAY. No, Raven was a girl with some extra meat on her bones that wanted to be a fashion designer and model her own work. Remember the episode where a magazine put her head on another model’s body because she didn’t have ‘the look’ and how Raven fought to change it? What happened to episodes like that, Disney Channel? Yes, That’s So Raven, despite being a show about a psychic, was the most real kids show on television. What about the episode dealing with racism when the store manager refused to hire Raven because she’s black? Or the episode dealing with drugs when Raven thought her brother, Cory, was smoking? This was a show that was popular and relatable. It didn’t feature a new song every week, it didn’t need to! The hilarious antics of the costume wearing Raven Baxter, mixed with life lessons we can actually read, made this show the best show Disney Channel came up with ever.

I wouldn’t say it was the best (BMW was an original Disney show), but it was among the last of the good shows. The problem with Nick and Disney is that the audience changed. Kid’s from the 90s-early 2000s were raised by parents who wanted their children to be well rounded, to have a sense of self that wasnt defined by society, to achieve greatness through hard work, to stand up for themselves, etc. From about 2003 on, the demographics changed. Parents were insisting that children be perfect, even if that meant that children weren’t to do their own work. Children were to be defined by society (smart, fit, a shining example of what it means to be a human, etc), which means that parents force their children to perform tasks they otherwise have no interest in and/or become famous in whatever talents the parents think they have. Children are taught to let others stand up for them and to prey on those who are weaker/different than they are. And, television changed to appeal to these children and parents.

(Source: lesbianest, via ahufflypufflygalaxydefender)

doctors-detectives-demons-oh-my:

Are we all going to forget the fact Karen Gillan randomly tweeted a picture of her wearing a long ginger wig and none of us even considered she was coming back to Doctor Who?

I have to say, I figured she’d be back at the end of 11’s run, but I was hoping it was because he realized he was an idiot and actually went 1 year into her future to rescue her (or took some sort of transportation into the city) instead of just hallucinating that she was there….

doctors-detectives-demons-oh-my:

Are we all going to forget the fact Karen Gillan randomly tweeted a picture of her wearing a long ginger wig and none of us even considered she was coming back to Doctor Who?

I have to say, I figured she’d be back at the end of 11’s run, but I was hoping it was because he realized he was an idiot and actually went 1 year into her future to rescue her (or took some sort of transportation into the city) instead of just hallucinating that she was there….

(Source: bad-day-at-blackrock, via vixxandbbands)

figmentdotcom:

sketchmedesire:

A sixth grader’s advice to future sixth graders.

…
Damn, kid. You speak truth.

figmentdotcom:

sketchmedesire:

A sixth grader’s advice to future sixth graders.

Damn, kid. You speak truth.

(Source: ashleymarieholt, via ticking-clocks-live)

Just an experiment. Reblog if you actually give a fuck about male victims of domestic violence and rape.

madskittlez29:

ohmygogapplejuice:

larrylouis:

lost-prince-of-asguard:

thepiscesactor:

This lack of notes is disturbing.

yes it is .. blog more people

The notes are very disappointing. Especially to me.

Gender has nothing to do with it: no person deserves to be treated that way, plain and simple.

I will always reblog this. It pisses me off when people say that men cant be raped because they can’t have sex if they dont want to. Or that men cant be abused because they’re men and they can defend themselves.

Men are humans. Humans can be taken advantage of, harmed, and otherwise destroyed by other humans. Gender, age, location, attire, etc have no baring on whether you’re likely to be a victim. Victims are caused by offenders, not by the victims themselves.

(via ticking-clocks-live)

ssjdebusk:

samwinchestercriesdurringsex:

I SHOULD NOT BE LAUGHING THIS HARD

ive never wanted something to catch on more than this child’s nickname in the fandom being welco
spread it like wild fire

ssjdebusk:

samwinchestercriesdurringsex:

I SHOULD NOT BE LAUGHING THIS HARD

ive never wanted something to catch on more than this child’s nickname in the fandom being welco

spread it like wild fire

(Source: fuck-boocky, via the-great-atzby)

ritchandspace:

Clara’s dad regenerated sometime since 2005.

(via i-am-in-way-too-many-fandoms)

foreverwholocked:

rogha:

burntlikethesun:

im not crying you’re crying

BBC- poor or parallel?

so clara’s parents probably knew a single mum living in a flat with her daughter and maybe if they were friends jackie would’ve told them about a man in her bedroom and years later they just disappeared and they never heard from them again

(via madihatter394)